Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

FòrumCAT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy

Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
technology
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • the_picard_maneuver@lemmy.worldT the_picard_maneuver@lemmy.world

    I'm not a judge, but isn't internet essentially a utility these days? Cutting someone off because of piracy seems like cutting off electricity or water because they did something illegal with it.

    F This user is from outside of this forum
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    flandish@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #99

    accused piracy, too. Not proven. Not convicted. Just “pirate go bye bye.”

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sickday@kbin.earthS sickday@kbin.earth

      i'd just go to a local fast food resturant and bring my portable piracy machine

      F This user is from outside of this forum
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      flandish@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #100

      i imagine you in a mcdonalds with an 80’s era easy bake oven plugged into an outlet in a booth with a sign saying “free cookies.”

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D deathbybigsad@sh.itjust.works

        I personally prefer Proton. They seem to get blocked less often.

        (And yes I'm aware of the CEO controversy, he seems more like a Libertarian to me, not some right wing extremist)

        L This user is from outside of this forum
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        lilililililil@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #101

        That mask almost fell but he’ll make sure it doesn’t slip again

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P peoplebeproblems@midwest.social

          And now I'm on a VPN because if they're just gonna cut people off for accusing of piracy they're gonna have to cut off everyone with a VPN.

          TBH I should have been behind a VPN before

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
          wrote last edited by
          #102

          Corporate America over here committing piracy en masse.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone

            i just use mullvad on my router and port forward directly there

            appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comA This user is from outside of this forum
            appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comA This user is from outside of this forum
            appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            wrote last edited by
            #103

            And how do users connect to your port if your VPN-WAN doesnt have a port forward?
            Same problem at a different point in the connection.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T tollana1234567@lemmy.today

              dint they just rule AI can legally scrape/books, but not for people who are pirating directly.

              jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
              wrote last edited by
              #104

              so then individuals could just train a model locally on the shittiest hardware they have

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tonytins@pawb.socialT tonytins@pawb.social
                This post did not contain any content.
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                kelp@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #105

                So this might be a good place to ask. How is a Trojan Proxy Server suited for anonymous piracy? Is it better or worse in case this passes?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                  I don't think your explanation of why it seems to work is correct.

                  I seems to work (works in a limited way, even), because any remote machines that your bittorrent client connected to during downloading are temporarilly recorded on the Mullvad router on the other side of your VPN doing NAT translation as associated with your machine, so when those remote machines connect to that router to reach your machine, it knows from that recorded association that those connections should be forwarded to your machine.

                  This is quite independent of people on the other side using port-forwarding or not.

                  Port-forwarding on the other hand is a static association between a port in that router and your machine, so that anything hitting that specific port of the router gets forwarded the port in your machine you specified (hence the name "port" "forwarding"). With port-forwarding there is no need for there having been an earlier connection from your machine to that remote machine to allow "call back".

                  This is why at the end of downloading a torrent behind a Mullvad VPN will keep on uploading but if one restarts a torrent which was stopped hours or days ago (i.e. purelly seeds), it never uploads anything to anybody - in the first case that NAT translation router associated all machines your client connected to during download to your machine, so when they connect back to download stuff from you it correctly forwards those connections to your machine, but in the second case it's just getting connections from unknown remote machines hitting one of its ports and in the absence of a "port-forwarding" static rule or a record of your machine having connected to those remote machines, it doesn't know which of the machines behind it is the one that should receive those connection so nothing gets forwarded.

                  So it's perfectly possible to share back when behind a Mullvad VPN but you have to leave the torrent client keep on seeding immediatly after downloading and it will only ever upload to machines which were in the swarm when the client was downloading (they need not have been clients it downloaded from, merelly clients it connected to, for example to check their availability of blocks to download, which give how bittorrent works normally means pretty much the whole swarm)

                  It is however not at all possible to just start seeding a torrent previously downloaded unless the download wasn't that long ago (how long is "too long" depends on how long the NAT Translation Router of Mullvad keeps those recorded associations I mentioned above, since those things are temporary and get automatically cleaned if not used),

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #106

                  Ok so now I'm confused entirely. Does that mean leeching I don't need to do a port forward, but seeding I do?

                  Which means if I want to leech to get the file then seed when I'm not heavily using my network I'm sort of out of luck?

                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T tollana1234567@lemmy.today

                    dint they just rule AI can legally scrape/books, but not for people who are pirating directly.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    saharamaleikuhm@feddit.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #107

                    The US is such a silly place. Everything is so wrong.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A andros_rex@lemmy.world

                      or even water

                      Already did.

                      We never stopped the “lol treaties with Native American tribes don’t count” bullshit.

                      jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
                      wrote last edited by
                      #108

                      to be fair the treaty never specified anything about water, and the Navajo nations should have had better lawyers or better guerilla warfare tactics if they wanted more negotiating power.

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S sillydude@lemmy.zip

                        Inb4 palantir cuts off your electric and water because you had 15% eye distraction during the mandatory 3hr nightly fox news viewing.

                        jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
                        wrote last edited by
                        #109

                        bottle water companies would love this, as would the oil giants

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J jimvandeventer@lemmy.world

                          I’m not a United Statesian so I have no clue anymore how it works there, but other places have been making the case that the Internet is an essential service and that access to it is a basic right. So to leapfrog off your question, is that like a poor person stealing a loaf of bread being cut off from food because they didn’t food responsibly enough?

                          jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
                          wrote last edited by
                          #110

                          didn't many European countries remove People's hand for theft a few centuries ago?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C catty@lemmy.world

                            lol, they'll have no customers! ISPs used to send 'warning' letters to customers in England but that's all.

                            H This user is from outside of this forum
                            H This user is from outside of this forum
                            hansolo@lemmy.today
                            wrote last edited by
                            #111

                            Same in the US.

                            I got one once from something I know for sure I didn't download. I always assumed it was a friend of mine staying with us that was torrenting "Boss's Daughter Big Booty XXX" or whatever it was, but I never really wanted to ask.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P peoplebeproblems@midwest.social

                              Ok so now I'm confused entirely. Does that mean leeching I don't need to do a port forward, but seeding I do?

                              Which means if I want to leech to get the file then seed when I'm not heavily using my network I'm sort of out of luck?

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                              wrote last edited by
                              #112

                              If you're purelly seeding (as in starting to seed a torrent from scratch never having downloaded it from the bittorrent client you're using or having done it a long time ago - days, weeks or longer), without port-forwarding it will simply not work and nobody can connect to your machine and downloade anything for that torrent because all those remote machines that are trying to connect to your client have no association with your machine on the Mullvad Router doing NAT translation.

                              If you're downloading a torrent and then leave it seeding for a while after the download phase is over, then it will usually work fine because the Mullvad Router doing NAT Translation still remembers the various remote machines that your machine connected to in the swarm for that torrent during the download stage, hence when those remote machines connect back trying to themselves download stuff from yours, it will know that's related your machine and thus accept those remote connection and forward them to your machine.

                              In practice this means that it if you leave your torrents seeding AFTER DOWNLOADING is over, usually (but not always as for torrents with very few peers the swarm is either too small or changes too fast) you can upload more than you downloaded, hence you're not leeching.

                              So if you use Mullvad and don't want to be a leecher, always leave your torrents active and uploading after you've downloaded them.

                              Personally I have mine set to 1.5 upload to download ratio and only seldom does it fail to reach it.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T tollana1234567@lemmy.today

                                dint they just rule AI can legally scrape/books, but not for people who are pirating directly.

                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                lepinkainen@lemmy.world
                                wrote last edited by
                                #113

                                IIRC the judge said they could use the data for training, but specifically added that piracy is still piracy and he didn’t rule on that.

                                So Disney can just sue Meta for one trillion 😀

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D dfx4509b_2@lemmy.org

                                  If it's upheld, that's the precursor to full-blown info blackouts, just cut off internet to anyone 'accused' of wrongspeak against the powers that be, which is basically everyone.

                                  This also sounds like SOPA reborn.

                                  0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                  0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                  0x0@lemmy.zip
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #114

                                  Oh, so like they do in the uncivilized middle-east?
                                  Naaaah

                                  D Z 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C cmdrshepard49@sh.itjust.works

                                    I love Mullvad and used them for years, but without port forwarding, they're not the service you want for torrenting. Some alternatives like AirVPN or ProtonVPN are better suited for that stuff.

                                    Before the haters jump in and tell me "it works fine fer me!" it's only working because the user on the other end, like myself, have port forwarding set up. Since you don't have it, you'll never connect to anyone else like yourself nor will they be able to connect to you.

                                    Of course there are alternatives like streaming and Usenet but there are tradeoffs no matter what you pick.

                                    beardedblaze@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    beardedblaze@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    beardedblaze@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #115

                                    Best alternative is a seedbox. Preferably in the Netherlands.

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • tonytins@pawb.socialT tonytins@pawb.social
                                      This post did not contain any content.
                                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                                      inferno@lemmy.ml
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #116

                                      "the internet" is a necessity and requirement to function in society. You can't be denied access to it anymore, it would be disproportionate.

                                      V U 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M monkdervierte@lemmy.zip

                                        And OpenAI of course.

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        antagnostic@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #117

                                        But it's not piracy if you use it for an LLM, right‽

                                        U 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K korhaka@sopuli.xyz

                                          4G piracy hub go brrrrr? Go ahead, disconnect me. I will get another SIM and resume piracy.

                                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          r0ertel@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #118

                                          Several countries require proof of ID to purchase a SIM card.

                                          dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.worldD B U 3 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups