Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

FòrumCAT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy

Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
technology
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com

    I don't think your explanation of why it seems to work is correct.

    I seems to work (works in a limited way, even), because any remote machines that your bittorrent client connected to during downloading are temporarilly recorded on the Mullvad router on the other side of your VPN doing NAT translation as associated with your machine, so when those remote machines connect to that router to reach your machine, it knows from that recorded association that those connections should be forwarded to your machine.

    This is quite independent of people on the other side using port-forwarding or not.

    Port-forwarding on the other hand is a static association between a port in that router and your machine, so that anything hitting that specific port of the router gets forwarded the port in your machine you specified (hence the name "port" "forwarding"). With port-forwarding there is no need for there having been an earlier connection from your machine to that remote machine to allow "call back".

    This is why at the end of downloading a torrent behind a Mullvad VPN will keep on uploading but if one restarts a torrent which was stopped hours or days ago (i.e. purelly seeds), it never uploads anything to anybody - in the first case that NAT translation router associated all machines your client connected to during download to your machine, so when they connect back to download stuff from you it correctly forwards those connections to your machine, but in the second case it's just getting connections from unknown remote machines hitting one of its ports and in the absence of a "port-forwarding" static rule or a record of your machine having connected to those remote machines, it doesn't know which of the machines behind it is the one that should receive those connection so nothing gets forwarded.

    So it's perfectly possible to share back when behind a Mullvad VPN but you have to leave the torrent client keep on seeding immediatly after downloading and it will only ever upload to machines which were in the swarm when the client was downloading (they need not have been clients it downloaded from, merelly clients it connected to, for example to check their availability of blocks to download, which give how bittorrent works normally means pretty much the whole swarm)

    It is however not at all possible to just start seeding a torrent previously downloaded unless the download wasn't that long ago (how long is "too long" depends on how long the NAT Translation Router of Mullvad keeps those recorded associations I mentioned above, since those things are temporary and get automatically cleaned if not used),

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    wrote last edited by
    #106

    Ok so now I'm confused entirely. Does that mean leeching I don't need to do a port forward, but seeding I do?

    Which means if I want to leech to get the file then seed when I'm not heavily using my network I'm sort of out of luck?

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T tollana1234567@lemmy.today

      dint they just rule AI can legally scrape/books, but not for people who are pirating directly.

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      saharamaleikuhm@feddit.org
      wrote last edited by
      #107

      The US is such a silly place. Everything is so wrong.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A andros_rex@lemmy.world

        or even water

        Already did.

        We never stopped the “lol treaties with Native American tribes don’t count” bullshit.

        jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
        wrote last edited by
        #108

        to be fair the treaty never specified anything about water, and the Navajo nations should have had better lawyers or better guerilla warfare tactics if they wanted more negotiating power.

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S sillydude@lemmy.zip

          Inb4 palantir cuts off your electric and water because you had 15% eye distraction during the mandatory 3hr nightly fox news viewing.

          jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
          wrote last edited by
          #109

          bottle water companies would love this, as would the oil giants

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J jimvandeventer@lemmy.world

            I’m not a United Statesian so I have no clue anymore how it works there, but other places have been making the case that the Internet is an essential service and that access to it is a basic right. So to leapfrog off your question, is that like a poor person stealing a loaf of bread being cut off from food because they didn’t food responsibly enough?

            jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
            wrote last edited by
            #110

            didn't many European countries remove People's hand for theft a few centuries ago?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C catty@lemmy.world

              lol, they'll have no customers! ISPs used to send 'warning' letters to customers in England but that's all.

              H This user is from outside of this forum
              H This user is from outside of this forum
              hansolo@lemmy.today
              wrote last edited by
              #111

              Same in the US.

              I got one once from something I know for sure I didn't download. I always assumed it was a friend of mine staying with us that was torrenting "Boss's Daughter Big Booty XXX" or whatever it was, but I never really wanted to ask.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P peoplebeproblems@midwest.social

                Ok so now I'm confused entirely. Does that mean leeching I don't need to do a port forward, but seeding I do?

                Which means if I want to leech to get the file then seed when I'm not heavily using my network I'm sort of out of luck?

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                wrote last edited by
                #112

                If you're purelly seeding (as in starting to seed a torrent from scratch never having downloaded it from the bittorrent client you're using or having done it a long time ago - days, weeks or longer), without port-forwarding it will simply not work and nobody can connect to your machine and downloade anything for that torrent because all those remote machines that are trying to connect to your client have no association with your machine on the Mullvad Router doing NAT translation.

                If you're downloading a torrent and then leave it seeding for a while after the download phase is over, then it will usually work fine because the Mullvad Router doing NAT Translation still remembers the various remote machines that your machine connected to in the swarm for that torrent during the download stage, hence when those remote machines connect back trying to themselves download stuff from yours, it will know that's related your machine and thus accept those remote connection and forward them to your machine.

                In practice this means that it if you leave your torrents seeding AFTER DOWNLOADING is over, usually (but not always as for torrents with very few peers the swarm is either too small or changes too fast) you can upload more than you downloaded, hence you're not leeching.

                So if you use Mullvad and don't want to be a leecher, always leave your torrents active and uploading after you've downloaded them.

                Personally I have mine set to 1.5 upload to download ratio and only seldom does it fail to reach it.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T tollana1234567@lemmy.today

                  dint they just rule AI can legally scrape/books, but not for people who are pirating directly.

                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  lepinkainen@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #113

                  IIRC the judge said they could use the data for training, but specifically added that piracy is still piracy and he didn’t rule on that.

                  So Disney can just sue Meta for one trillion 😀

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D dfx4509b_2@lemmy.org

                    If it's upheld, that's the precursor to full-blown info blackouts, just cut off internet to anyone 'accused' of wrongspeak against the powers that be, which is basically everyone.

                    This also sounds like SOPA reborn.

                    0 This user is from outside of this forum
                    0 This user is from outside of this forum
                    0x0@lemmy.zip
                    wrote last edited by
                    #114

                    Oh, so like they do in the uncivilized middle-east?
                    Naaaah

                    D Z 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • C cmdrshepard49@sh.itjust.works

                      I love Mullvad and used them for years, but without port forwarding, they're not the service you want for torrenting. Some alternatives like AirVPN or ProtonVPN are better suited for that stuff.

                      Before the haters jump in and tell me "it works fine fer me!" it's only working because the user on the other end, like myself, have port forwarding set up. Since you don't have it, you'll never connect to anyone else like yourself nor will they be able to connect to you.

                      Of course there are alternatives like streaming and Usenet but there are tradeoffs no matter what you pick.

                      beardedblaze@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                      beardedblaze@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                      beardedblaze@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #115

                      Best alternative is a seedbox. Preferably in the Netherlands.

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tonytins@pawb.socialT tonytins@pawb.social
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                        inferno@lemmy.ml
                        wrote last edited by
                        #116

                        "the internet" is a necessity and requirement to function in society. You can't be denied access to it anymore, it would be disproportionate.

                        V U 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • M monkdervierte@lemmy.zip

                          And OpenAI of course.

                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          antagnostic@lemmy.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #117

                          But it's not piracy if you use it for an LLM, right‽

                          U 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K korhaka@sopuli.xyz

                            4G piracy hub go brrrrr? Go ahead, disconnect me. I will get another SIM and resume piracy.

                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            r0ertel@lemmy.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #118

                            Several countries require proof of ID to purchase a SIM card.

                            dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.worldD B U 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • A altphoto@lemmy.today

                              In the beginning we used to exchange cassettes. You would have a boombox with two cassettes. You would play one while you recorded on the other. Then you gave the cassette back to your friend. Next was the VCR with the big ass cassettes.

                              Then you would do the same with floppies, then zip disks. Then one day CD recording was a thing, then DVDs. Then thumb drives and now portable HDDs. Basically the cheapest form or recording is always the most popular way for people to share stuff.

                              The only ones who don't want us to share are those who want to make millions by never innovating.

                              R This user is from outside of this forum
                              R This user is from outside of this forum
                              r0ertel@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #119

                              I couldn't afford one of those fancy 2-cassette boomboxes, so I had my friend bring his tape deck and we put them real close together in the quietest room of the house and recorded that way. Having several siblings meant that there were no quiet places, so we used the empty garage when my parents were at work. The audio was autrocious, tons of echo and static, but I played that tape thin until it snapped.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world

                                Guess it's time to go underground, sigh.

                                dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world
                                wrote last edited by
                                #120

                                You should already be underground

                                F 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • beardedblaze@lemmy.worldB beardedblaze@lemmy.world

                                  Best alternative is a seedbox. Preferably in the Netherlands.

                                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                                  r0ertel@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #121

                                  I keep my seedbox in the planter at the coffee shop down the road with free WiFi.

                                  beardedblaze@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R r0ertel@lemmy.world

                                    Several countries require proof of ID to purchase a SIM card.

                                    dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #122

                                    Alas, true for mine

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A antagnostic@lemmy.world

                                      But it's not piracy if you use it for an LLM, right‽

                                      U This user is from outside of this forum
                                      U This user is from outside of this forum
                                      unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #123

                                      Yes we are all training our LLMs. Perfectly legal.

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world

                                        Don't give them ideas. Next they'll cut the blood stream to your brain.

                                        medicsofanarchy@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        medicsofanarchy@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #124

                                        Supreme Court: "One of us! One of us!"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.worksJ jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works

                                          to be fair the treaty never specified anything about water, and the Navajo nations should have had better lawyers or better guerilla warfare tactics if they wanted more negotiating power.

                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          andros_rex@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #125

                                          Yeah, it worked so well at Alcatraz.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups