Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

FòrumCAT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So @pixelfed still hasn't fully acknowledged nor fixed the security vulnerability from earlier this year, despite multiple people asking for updates over the past ~6 months.

So @pixelfed still hasn't fully acknowledged nor fixed the security vulnerability from earlier this year, despite multiple people asking for updates over the past ~6 months.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
47 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT thisismissem@hachyderm.io

    @rey @chad @dansup @deadsuperhero yes, and the only response has been an accusation of spread misinformation which was easily disproven

    chad@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
    chad@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
    chad@mstdn.ca
    wrote last edited by
    #41

    @thisismissem @rey @dansup @deadsuperhero I feel that given the overall careful discussion here, an accusation of misinformation is a great departure.

    thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT thisismissem@hachyderm.io

      @chad @dansup @deadsuperhero If he's not actually doing the leading then that's a problem. Where are the people doing PRs? He chased them all off, I can think of at least 3 people that wanted to contribute actively to his projects and he pissed them off by being completely unpredictable to work with.

      hiphopheaven@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
      hiphopheaven@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
      hiphopheaven@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #42

      @thisismissem @chad @dansup @deadsuperhero why do they not create an alternative? This ia suppose to be the power of open source you can fork projects and create new wonderful things

      chad@mstdn.caC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • hiphopheaven@mastodon.socialH hiphopheaven@mastodon.social

        @thisismissem @chad @dansup @deadsuperhero why do they not create an alternative? This ia suppose to be the power of open source you can fork projects and create new wonderful things

        chad@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
        chad@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
        chad@mstdn.ca
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        @hiphopheaven @thisismissem @dansup @deadsuperhero there's no one stopping anyone from forking Dan's projects.

        thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • chad@mstdn.caC chad@mstdn.ca

          @thisismissem @rey @dansup @deadsuperhero I feel that given the overall careful discussion here, an accusation of misinformation is a great departure.

          thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
          thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
          thisismissem@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #44

          @chad @rey @dansup @deadsuperhero that was *his* accusation. Not mine. I then spent the time to review the changes, and was fully prepared to update as resolved, only, it wasn't & the changes where thousands of lines of unrelated code. I spent quite some time checking.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • chad@mstdn.caC chad@mstdn.ca

            @hiphopheaven @thisismissem @dansup @deadsuperhero there's no one stopping anyone from forking Dan's projects.

            thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
            thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
            thisismissem@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #45

            @chad @hiphopheaven @dansup @deadsuperhero it's hard when he'll actively fight against you, iirc, he got extremely mad when pixelfed-glitch was started, and threatened a trademark lawsuit. That probably killed that person's energy to work on it.

            He also went after the developer of Vernissage a while back too, when they decided to do their own thing away from pixelfed.

            Meanwhile he raises 100k for pixelfed, but it seems like all the energy is going into his other projects.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • chad@mstdn.caC chad@mstdn.ca

              @thisismissem @dansup @deadsuperhero all those words are great, and I align with many of them, but I still haven't seen anyone offer a PR for any of his projects.

              Honestly, and I'm sorry to say, this is a step up or shut up situation.

              "He created too much too quickly" really isn't aligned with any of the values many of us hold in the hopes of growth of the fediverse.

              julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
              julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
              julian@community.nodebb.org
              wrote last edited by
              #46

              chad@mstdn.ca re: "step up or shut up", thisismissem@hachyderm.io has been (is currently?) a contributor for Pixelfed, and was the person responsible for the discovery, analysis, and responsible disclosure of the 10/10 severity vulnerability from last year.

              She also provided best practice recommendations and guidance on remediation, all for free (there was no security fund back then, and Pixelfed has no bug bounty.)

              For her to buck responsible disclosure practice (and even then she's being deliberately vague about the technical details) is a sign that someone is being stonewalled.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups