Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

FòrumCAT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy

Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
technology
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B bold_atlas@lemmy.world

    My routine is always use piratebay, never use a pirate streaming site, no new or big studio releases, no porn, not seeding for long and choosing less active torrents. I can't say much for how effective it is since I've never gotten hit so I can't really experiment (I've had five or six ISPs in two different countries).

    they literally just pirate the stuff themselves, see which IPs connect to them, then connect those to an ISP and notify them.

    And I don't even understand how this would hold up if it ever went to trial. How can an IP owner "pirate" their own IP? Even when they outsource it to services who do this they're still giving permission for the IP to be distributed.

    It's like hiring someone to "steal" your own TV, putting it in a back alley and then accusing whoever takes it of being a thief.

    R This user is from outside of this forum
    R This user is from outside of this forum
    robust_mirror@aussie.zone
    wrote last edited by
    #168

    It's generally seen as okay on a similar level to undercover work. They do it for Investigation reasons, the torrent was already uploaded before they joined, their monitoring serves a legitimate law enforcement purpose, and they're authorized by the copyright holder (themselves) to do it. They didn't put the movie or whatever out there themselves.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tonytins@pawb.socialT tonytins@pawb.social
      This post did not contain any content.
      Z This user is from outside of this forum
      Z This user is from outside of this forum
      zer0bitz@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #169

      See you guys in I2P 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Z ziltoid1991@lemmy.world

        Their uncivilized censorship regime vs. our civilized online child protection and anti-terror laws.

        0 This user is from outside of this forum
        0 This user is from outside of this forum
        0x0@lemmy.zip
        wrote last edited by
        #170

        So you bought into the think of the children argument?
        You know that's a red-herring, right? It's really about eroding privacy.

        Z 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 0 0x0@lemmy.zip

          So you bought into the think of the children argument?
          You know that's a red-herring, right? It's really about eroding privacy.

          Z This user is from outside of this forum
          Z This user is from outside of this forum
          ziltoid1991@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #171

          It was supposed to be a reference to a meme making fun of "us vs. them" mentalities. I know enough about the think of the children argument.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M mangionedontmiss@lemmy.ca

            ha. all of my traffic is encrypted and routed through at least 3 pirate friendly countries and servers that don't keep logs. good fucking luck inspecting those packets.

            H This user is from outside of this forum
            H This user is from outside of this forum
            hupf@feddit.org
            wrote last edited by
            #172

            behind 7 proxies

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml

              Always make sure that QBT uses your VPN's network interface. I got some DMCA emails despite split-tunneling a VPN recently, and I realized it was bound to all interfaces by default - that's no good.

              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl
              wrote last edited by
              #173

              Better to just configure a firewall properly so that no packets can go outside of the vpn tunnel.

              I 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl

                Better to just configure a firewall properly so that no packets can go outside of the vpn tunnel.

                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
                wrote last edited by
                #174

                How is that better? If you configure your firewall rules incorrectly, this protects you against that. This ensures you have no connection if your VPN isn't on/isn't working.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H hitekrednek@lemmy.world

                  What's crazy is that Trump claims to be against the current ruling in Sony's favor, and is siding with Cox.

                  steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                  steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                  steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works
                  wrote last edited by
                  #175

                  Instruction unclear?
                  So trump like cocks?

                  Good for him!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Y yggstyle@lemmy.world

                    Gonna be a lot of issues that come from this. Legally speaking. It's already on the books that an IP address doesn't represent a single person... so I'm not terribly clear on how they plan to enforce this even if it were to pass.

                    projectmoon@forum.agnos.isP This user is from outside of this forum
                    projectmoon@forum.agnos.isP This user is from outside of this forum
                    projectmoon@forum.agnos.is
                    wrote last edited by
                    #176

                    You assume precedent, consistency, or ethics matter to the current people in power in the US.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups