Adobe is on BlueSky! no, wait...
-
Nah, defederation means we couldn't bully them anymore.
wrote 30 days ago last edited byis bullying worthier than having a peace of mind?
-
call for defederating the instance they'd signed up on.
Lululemmy.com is still around though.
wrote 30 days ago last edited byOkay Lululemmy is a great name actually.
-
is bullying worthier than having a peace of mind?
wrote 30 days ago last edited byBullying unethical companies is peace of mind.
-
Bullying unethical companies is peace of mind.
wrote 30 days ago last edited bycarry on then!
-
Is everyone friendly to Adobe on other platforms?
wrote 30 days ago last edited byThey're flooded by the bots, or filtered, on other platforms. Couple that with Bluesky being a new platform with a decidedly anti-corporate user bias, and the message ratios change dramatically.
-
Bullying unethical companies is peace of mind.
wrote 30 days ago last edited byBullying will continue untill moralle improves !
-
I mean, good? I guess they'd bring some user growth, but they'd just post their brand stuff that I don't imagine most people really want in their feeds, and there's the risk that they end up getting favored treatment on larger instances by donating more than a typical user can or paying the moderators there.
wrote 30 days ago last edited byYes, we want to build a social network free of the corporate hold so we shouldn't be eager to welcome corporation.
-
wrote 30 days ago last edited by
Bluesky isn’t fediverse
-
Pretty sure this late into the game Adobe know full well that people hate them, I think they underestimated the level of corporate greed and enshittification that Bluesky has and will return when things are more “corporate friendly”
wrote 30 days ago last edited byThey trying to engage in BlueSky is evidence they didn't know.
It's surprising to me too.
-
They're flooded by the bots, or filtered, on other platforms. Couple that with Bluesky being a new platform with a decidedly anti-corporate user bias, and the message ratios change dramatically.
wrote 30 days ago last edited byGotcha I was confused how this could be a surprise to them lol
-
That's how you keep Twitter alive
wrote 30 days ago last edited byIf it's all bots and PR departments, it's basically irrelevant.
-
wrote 30 days ago last edited by
It's always okay to cyberbully Adobe though
-
I mean, good? I guess they'd bring some user growth, but they'd just post their brand stuff that I don't imagine most people really want in their feeds, and there's the risk that they end up getting favored treatment on larger instances by donating more than a typical user can or paying the moderators there.
wrote 30 days ago last edited byMy thoughts exactly.
There are vanishingly few places on the Internet that are not inundated with constant ads, promotions, astroturfing, and commercials.
It's why I like it here.
-
It's always okay to cyberbully Adobe though
wrote 30 days ago last edited byIronically, it's free!
-
I feel like corporations look at Lemmy/The Fediverse the same way Mufasa looked at the place where the hyenas lived.
wrote 30 days ago last edited bymeanwhile i look at Lemmy/Fediverse the same way e621 looks at the place where the hyenas lived
-
wrote 30 days ago last edited by
And nothing of value was lost that day.
-
My thoughts exactly.
There are vanishingly few places on the Internet that are not inundated with constant ads, promotions, astroturfing, and commercials.
It's why I like it here.
wrote 29 days ago last edited bySure I don't want ads pumped into my feed but some corporations can do social media well. I used to follow Yorkshire Tea on twitter who were generally pretty funny, I don't drink even drink their teas.
-
Sure I don't want ads pumped into my feed but some corporations can do social media well. I used to follow Yorkshire Tea on twitter who were generally pretty funny, I don't drink even drink their teas.
wrote 29 days ago last edited byAlso way too many corps don't have up to date information on their website and their twitter profile has more recent info. The lack of that on any FOSS/decentralized social media means that some people just have to keep a centralized account open.
-
Also way too many corps don't have up to date information on their website and their twitter profile has more recent info. The lack of that on any FOSS/decentralized social media means that some people just have to keep a centralized account open.
wrote 29 days ago last edited by@scintilla@lemm.ee that's the main thing for me too. That news orgs, political agencies, and corporations use Xitter to communicate is the real travesty.