Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

FòrumCAT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have a #Fediverse #ActivityPub question:

I have a #Fediverse #ActivityPub question:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
fediverseactivitypubmastodonpixelfed
9 Posts 5 Posters 35 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    treefit@fosstodon.org
    wrote on 24 Jan 2025, 23:28 last edited by
    #1

    I have a #Fediverse #ActivityPub question:
    Why doesn't my client ( #mastodon or #pixelfed ) automatically load the comments from the original page so that all comments are visible?
    Is there a technical reason?

    D 1 Reply Last reply 25 Jan 2025, 14:29
    0
    • T treefit@fosstodon.org
      24 Jan 2025, 23:28

      I have a #Fediverse #ActivityPub question:
      Why doesn't my client ( #mastodon or #pixelfed ) automatically load the comments from the original page so that all comments are visible?
      Is there a technical reason?

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      danialbehzadi@persadon.com
      wrote on 25 Jan 2025, 14:29 last edited by
      #2

      @treefit
      AP works in a push nature, not pull. It may be related to overload on servers.

      T 1 Reply Last reply 25 Jan 2025, 14:31
      0
      • D danialbehzadi@persadon.com
        25 Jan 2025, 14:29

        @treefit
        AP works in a push nature, not pull. It may be related to overload on servers.

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        treefit@fosstodon.org
        wrote on 25 Jan 2025, 14:31 last edited by
        #3

        @danialbehzadi I'm just wondering why clients don't pull on demand to provide a complete view on the comments

        L 1 Reply Last reply 25 Jan 2025, 18:36
        0
        • T treefit@fosstodon.org
          25 Jan 2025, 14:31

          @danialbehzadi I'm just wondering why clients don't pull on demand to provide a complete view on the comments

          L This user is from outside of this forum
          L This user is from outside of this forum
          liaizon@social.wake.st
          wrote on 25 Jan 2025, 18:36 last edited by
          #4

          @treefit @danialbehzadi some clients support this and some types of fediverse servers also support this. @jonny is currently working on a PR to add a "load more remote conversation" button into Mastodon if I understood right

          J 1 Reply Last reply 25 Jan 2025, 18:59
          0
          • L liaizon@social.wake.st
            25 Jan 2025, 18:36

            @treefit @danialbehzadi some clients support this and some types of fediverse servers also support this. @jonny is currently working on a PR to add a "load more remote conversation" button into Mastodon if I understood right

            J This user is from outside of this forum
            J This user is from outside of this forum
            julian@community.nodebb.org
            wrote on 25 Jan 2025, 18:59 last edited by
            #5

            @liaizon@social.wake.st I'm not entirely sold on the replies collection traversal logic as penned by @jonny@neuromatch.social

            It doubles down on the premise that individual notes are isolated entities whose connection to other notes is dictated solely by inReplyTo and replies.

            7888 introduces the concept of a conversational context, which is maintained by the original conversation starter. When you have an ad-hoc source like this, you can just ask the context owner to supply the entire set of responses in one single call (or perhaps a few more if paginated.) No replies traversal needed.

            L 1 Reply Last reply 25 Jan 2025, 19:10
            0
            • J julian@community.nodebb.org
              25 Jan 2025, 18:59

              @liaizon@social.wake.st I'm not entirely sold on the replies collection traversal logic as penned by @jonny@neuromatch.social

              It doubles down on the premise that individual notes are isolated entities whose connection to other notes is dictated solely by inReplyTo and replies.

              7888 introduces the concept of a conversational context, which is maintained by the original conversation starter. When you have an ad-hoc source like this, you can just ask the context owner to supply the entire set of responses in one single call (or perhaps a few more if paginated.) No replies traversal needed.

              L This user is from outside of this forum
              L This user is from outside of this forum
              liaizon@social.wake.st
              wrote on 25 Jan 2025, 19:10 last edited by
              #6

              @julian @treefit I personally don't have any "horses in this race" other then getting things to work better. I would imagine #fep7888* would need serious "buy in" from Mastodon for it to really take hold as the way forward so if the way @jonny implementing this for Mastodon has potentially more of a likelihood of getting merged this year then I welcome it...

              * https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-7888-demystifying-the-context-property/3021/19

              J 1 Reply Last reply 25 Jan 2025, 19:37
              0
              • L liaizon@social.wake.st
                25 Jan 2025, 19:10

                @julian @treefit I personally don't have any "horses in this race" other then getting things to work better. I would imagine #fep7888* would need serious "buy in" from Mastodon for it to really take hold as the way forward so if the way @jonny implementing this for Mastodon has potentially more of a likelihood of getting merged this year then I welcome it...

                * https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-7888-demystifying-the-context-property/3021/19

                J This user is from outside of this forum
                J This user is from outside of this forum
                julian@community.nodebb.org
                wrote on 25 Jan 2025, 19:37 last edited by
                #7

                @liaizon@social.wake.st you are not wrong about that. @jonny@neuromatch.social's approach works now, but I'm not sure how well it will scale.

                It could be perfectly fine. It might not, who knows.

                But it's a good thing there's more to the fediverse than Mastodon.

                J 1 Reply Last reply 25 Jan 2025, 20:18
                0
                • J julian@community.nodebb.org
                  25 Jan 2025, 19:37

                  @liaizon@social.wake.st you are not wrong about that. @jonny@neuromatch.social's approach works now, but I'm not sure how well it will scale.

                  It could be perfectly fine. It might not, who knows.

                  But it's a good thing there's more to the fediverse than Mastodon.

                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  jonny@neuromatch.social
                  wrote on 25 Jan 2025, 20:18 last edited by
                  #8

                  @julian
                  @liaizon
                  Yeah. That sounds cool but raises serious problems about trust, moderation, and implementation. Lmk when there is a working implementation of it anywhere, in the meantime I'm gonna try to get something that works deployed

                  J 1 Reply Last reply 25 Jan 2025, 20:49
                  0
                  • J jonny@neuromatch.social
                    25 Jan 2025, 20:18

                    @julian
                    @liaizon
                    Yeah. That sounds cool but raises serious problems about trust, moderation, and implementation. Lmk when there is a working implementation of it anywhere, in the meantime I'm gonna try to get something that works deployed

                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    julian@community.nodebb.org
                    wrote on 25 Jan 2025, 20:49 last edited by
                    #9

                    @jonny@neuromatch.social sure! NodeBB has it working now if you want to poke around on BrowserPub, just paste a topic URL into it.

                    v4.0.0 can pull entire topics in already (assuming the remote end supports it.)

                    When v4.1 drops you'll be able to do this via the topic URL itself.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes

                    4/9

                    25 Jan 2025, 18:36


                    • Login

                    4 out of 9
                    • First post
                      4/9
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups